Pension funds: Quarterly ratings don't make sense

A growing media focus on pension funds' quarterly results is at best pointless, and at worst, can prompt managers to step up risk taking in order to beat peers next time around. AMWatch asks players across the Nordic pensions industry about the pros and cons of transparency.

Announcing winners and losers based on quarterly results is in the best case a waste of time, pension industry says. | Photo: Colourbox

As transparency becomes increasingly important throughout public life, so pension funds are open about their activities including the financial returns they make on their clients’ money. More and more, pension funds are asked for media comment on quarterly results.

While it may make sense for an individual to keep updated on what market event may mean for a given investment portfolio, it does not make sense to compare pension funds’ overall results on a quarterly basis, industry players say.

Read the whole article

Get 14 days free access.
No credit card required.

  • Access all locked articles
  • Receive our daily newsletters
  • Access our app
An error has occured. Please try again later.

Get full access for you and your coworkers.

Start a free company trial today

More from AMWatch

Savills IM working hard on first Nordic residential investment

The global property investor has plans to expand its growing portfolio in Denmark with a new asset class, residential real estate, "very soon," says Head of Nordics Peter Broström. The manager still believes in the office and retail sectors, despite the pandemic and rising inflation.

Further reading

Latest news


Latest news from FinansWatch (dk)

Latest news from EnergyWatch

Latest news from ShippingWatch